🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager endured losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.